It started as a provincial experiment… and then it went viral.
Meme: a cultural item that is transmitted by repetition and replication in a manner analogous to the biological transmission of genes.
Or, in other words a meme is the core idea or video, etc, that goes viral. The meaning of the word “meme” has itself behaved like a virus, evolving to evoke the idea of a seed paradigm, a thought that is a progenitor of a family of thoughts or models.
Our world is currently facing a sequence of oncoming calamities. Uncle Albert was on target when he pointed out that –
“The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.”
– Albert Einstein
We simply must choose some radically new paths while letting go some deep and longstanding habits. I would go further to say that our tasks is to do this while accelerating our use of time (in an already accelerated world) and to do this we must actually gain control of several of our root memes. We HAVE to be WILLING TO QUESTION EVERYTHING. Including some sacred cows. Usually these fundamental thoughts are taken as A Priori (something that is so self-evident that it needs no proof.) But are they, really?
“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
– Albert Einstein
Here are a few preliminary perspectives to help us move forward:
- Axiom 1: It is not necessary to know how to do something to take it on and get it done. If that were so, we would have nothing, we would be nothing. If the inventor of the car needed to know how to make a car before setting out to invent it…there would currently be no autos. In every case the desire to create comes before knowing how to and then we create how to do it as we go. After that it’s a matter of repetition. Same goes for walking…first desire, then will to do it, then achievement.
- Axiom 2: Until we step outside of the box, we may not know that there is a box, or that we are trapped in the box… with this there’s no way forward.
- A posteriori 1: How do we step outside of the box when we’re barely aware of the box? Through the use of the mind as a tool rather than the mind using us as its tool. Our intuition can take us out of the box if we learn to use it instead of letting mind run us.
“The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.”
– Albert Einstein
OK, if we basically agree on these we’re suited up and prepared for our expedition. The destination…
The Money Meme
Money is not necessary.
Not even a little bit. It’s an experiment that we’ve engaged for several millennia that is finally coming to fruition. We now have all the necessary data that a rational scientist would need to come to some conclusions. However, very few of us are scientists and far fewer still are rational. We are, instead, human-beings and possess other strengths that we must come to utilize in time to, well, survive our research projects.
In fact, the only purpose I have been able to solidly identify for the current existence of money boils down to this simple point:
Money is designed to get people to do what they do NOT want to do. It is a primary path to the usurpation of free will. I have done the math on this 7 ways from Sunday and that’s what it always boils down to.
So I have two simple questions for you (and I will pose them more than once – because ‘it’s a process’):
- Are you pro free will?
- Are you interested in or at least curios about life in a world beyond money?
I am not asking you for or presenting you with ways to get there. I am NOT interested in providing specific paths to get there. This tends to be the single biggest distraction that our resistance generates regarding this question. So with that out of the way…let’s look at some of our primary blocks.
Some Common Concerns:
- How would we pay for things or know what anything is worth without money?
- How will we eat, have housing, survive?
- In general terms how will we conduct business?
- Are you suggesting Barter? That’s way too cumbersome!
- I don’t see how we’d ever get there.
- Do you have a BETTER idea!?
I’m going to reduce these to three broad categories:
- How will we get there/Do you have a better idea? (Note Albert’s 2nd quote and Axiom 1))
- How will I get people to do those things I’m not willing or able to do?
- How will I get my stuff?
Mackle: [mak-uh l].
Noun: A blur in printing, as from a double impression.
Verb : (Used with object), verb (used without object),mackled, mackling. To blur, as from a double impression in printing.
Supply and demand are the most common metrics for setting value. This is followed by the concept of ‘transmission of value’ which is predicated on the notion that money provides some stability of value. Some would say that the value is in the eye of the beholder and therefore we need a way to universally agree on that value and that without money (or some other abstract method of valuation) there would be no perception of value or there would be no way to share value.
With this we can see how we get our value from money. That is to say we value some people more and others less based on the amount of money that they have or can generate. There are other criteria by which we assign value.
Yet transmission of value is based on the perception of lack, which is a created perception that is not real. In other words – “Transmission of value?” Why?
What Do We Truly Lack?
Certainly not diamonds.
Example: In the early 80’s I was a co-owner/operator of a business that hosted a (if not the first) gem stone market index. This was all about establishing the values of gem stones; many of which are used solely for investment purposes. Eventually we were approached by DeBeers Consolidated Mines. They wanted to purchase the system to secure a way to better control the valuation of diamonds which had been thought to be rare. In fact diamonds were not and are not rare. Of course the largest and clearest and most unique are rare but otherwise not. This had begun to come to light toward the end of the previous decade. To maintain their value by rarity, the cartel actually scuttled a ship load of some of their ‘best’ diamonds somewhere in the deepest part of the North Sea. Waste is one of the best ways to maintain lack.
Certainly not fuel.
Example: Many cars, trucks and even heavy equipment can be run almost as is on alcohol (ethanol). Ethanol can be distilled from organic matter grown for that purpose or food waste, even at a community based, local industrial, level. The American farming industry, in that era prior to its takeover by Agri-biz, was powered by pollution free alcohol until it was rerouted to petroleum during prohibition.
This was the fuel of choice throughout the US and much of Europe prior to the petroleum revolution (led by John D Rockefeller.) Alcohol was the fuel that powered German mobility during the Second World War; making severance of the fuel supply line almost impossible, since it was being produced provincially.
Currently the vast majority of cars on the road could be converted to alcohol. If it’s not already a Flex Fuel vehicle there may need to be modifications to the computer. Too much trouble for clean cheap fuel? I wonder why most of us have never heard of this.
Certainly not food.
Example: Here’s something you may not have known: In 2008, we grew enough food for 11 billion people. (Video version) We are a planet of approximately 7 billion people. What happened to the excess?
Funding the Cure
The principle of rapid breakdown and replace or breakdown and repair is nowhere better demonstrated than in marriage between the MedTech-Pharmaceutical and the Banking industries. There are so many approaches to this that we’ll need to pick one. How about researching disease cures?
We think that research is about finding ways to cure disease. It is not. Research is most often intended to create maintenance drugs and protocols. It is rapidly becoming clear that there will be no cure for AIDS and there will probably be no cure for cancer (at least until it can be replaced with something that we find at least as engaging and frightening; say for example – Ebola.) However we will have great success in developing maintenance pharmacology to sustain any illness or disease that shows up, for the duration of the patient’s life; and we will be ‘eternally’ grateful for these. That is to say we will go from being people to being patients, until death do us (patients and Big Pharma) part. As long as we are maintained on those drugs we will be paying money to the pharmaceutical and medical technology industries. All talk of cure soon degenerates into the incremental hope for one more day of survival. People will pay for survival every single day for the rest of their lives. A cure provides only a single payday. Cancer will never be cured. The common cold will never be cured. But we will forever generate wonder drugs to help us feel better while we harbor these necessary diseases. Why are they necessary? Is it natural? No. It’s fiscal. It’s by intention.
In Closing Part 1
I am grateful for the opportunity to finally begin this communication. Third time’s the charm.
I have tried to get this one out at least twice in the past. I’ve written this blog, in its entirety, and in each case prior to publication…the whole thing has disappeared. The first time it was somehow disappeared from two or three separate storage devices; two hard drives and one thumb drive. Nothing else seemed to have been lost. The second time vanished a hand written version on PAPER, while in the process of being transcribed to a digital file. Let me clarify by saying that I DON’T believe it was erased by the NSA or some other surveillance organization. And I seriously doubt it was tampered with by sprites, demons, ifreets, djinn, ghosts, archons or any other such characters. More likely than not it’s been my own unconscious resistance to enter this conversation, publicly. Although one can never know for certain.
But, what the hell. Let’s do this. Let’s talk about the unspeakable. Isn’t that what we do here?
Next
Next we’ll continue to examine the twists in our minds, those assumptions that have made this topic unthinkable. We’ll take a moment to muse what a world without money might look like; for example finding out how we might still manage to get our “stuff.” We’ll also get to what this has to do with free will. You may remember that we took a brief foray into that topic a little while back. We’ll meet a few pundits of the money topic (maybe one of them has some answers.) And finally we’ll circle back to find a reason for bringing to light what is, in any event, inevitable; the end of money.
Until next time… Bon fete’!
Extras:
This time all the relevant extras have been embedded in the text. For your convenience, they were:
One of Michael Pollen’s Food Rules which demonstrates that hunger is not based on true lack:
Here’s something you may not have known: In 2008, we grew enough food for 11 billion people.
Source: www.Upworthy.com
Alcohol, the pollution free, corporate free, easy to access fuel of past and future. Here you will find an interview with David Blume, author of “Alcohol Can Be A Gas.”
Source: www.TheHighersideChats.com
The real costs and worth of extending life. One economic look at what we are willing to pay to stay alive…and more.
Source: www.Radiolab.org


























